The Local Government Pension Scheme (Elected Member Pensions) (Consequential Amendment) Regulations 2026
The Armed Forces Act 2021 primarily amends and updates the law governing the discipline, administration, and justice system of the UK Armed Forces, focusing on procedural efficiency, clarification of powers relating to service offences, modifications to administrative processes like discharge, and refining sentencing and jurisdiction within the service courts.
Arguments For
The Act modernizes and clarifies the service justice system, ensuring it remains robust, fair, and effective in holding service personnel accountable.
Introducing new summary jurisdiction powers allows for quicker, more proportionate responses to minor disciplinary matters, reducing administrative burden.
Provisions regarding the discharge and termination of service provide greater clarity and consistency in administrative processes affecting service personnel.
Extending the ability to defer court martial sentencing improves flexibility in dealing with complex cases involving service personnel, especially where civilian proceedings are also involved.
Clarifying certain aspects of existing service law keeps the disciplinary code aligned with contemporary values and legal standards.
Arguments Against
Critics may argue that expanding summary jurisdiction risks undermining judicial independence or disproportionately punishing minor infractions at an early stage without full due process.
Detailed administrative changes to discharge procedures, while aimed at consistency, might inadvertently remove necessary discretionary powers held by commanding officers in unique circumstances.
Any amendment to service law requires significant training and familiarization across the chain of command, potentially leading to temporary inconsistencies in application during the transition period.
Concerns might arise about the potential overlap or conflict between service law procedures and civilian justice outcomes, particularly following deferred sentencing.
PART 1 SERVICE JUSTICE SYSTEM Jurisdiction 1. (1) Section 104 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (jurisdiction of Courts Martial) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (2), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(3) In subsection (3), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(4) In subsection (4), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(5) In subsection (5), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(6) In subsection (6), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
This part amends Section 104 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 concerning which individuals fall under the jurisdiction of Courts Martial.
The principal change involves replacing the phrase "a person subject to service law" with the more general phrasing "a person to whom service law applies" wherever it appears in that section, ensuring consistent legal terminology regarding who can be tried by a Court Martial.
(1) Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (power to charge person with offence under service law or civilian law) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (2), for “Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act 2006” substitute “This section”.
(3) Insert after subsection (3)—
“(3A) If the Director of Service Prosecutions decides to charge the person under service law with an offence under service law, the Director must give a notice in writing to the person stating that the Director has decided to charge the person under service law with an offence under service law.”
(4) In subsection (4), for “subsection (3)” substitute “subsection (3A) and (3)”.
This modifies Section 115 of the 2006 Act, which deals with the power to prosecute an individual under either service law or civilian law for an offense committed.
A significant addition requires the Director of Service Prosecutions (DSP) to issue a written notice to the person if they choose to initiate proceedings under service law, ensuring the accused is formally informed of the legal pathway selected.
(1) Section 124 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (referral of charge to Court Martial) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(3) In subsection (2), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(4) In subsection (3), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(5) In subsection (4), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(6) In subsection (5), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(7) In subsection (6), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
Section 124 outlines the procedure for referring a charge to a Court Martial.
This amendment reverses terminology used in the previous sections: it changes references from "a person to whom service law applies" back to "a person subject to service law" within various subsections of Section 124.
- Section 134 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (Power of commanding officer to award punishment) is amended as follows.
(1) In subsection (1), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(2) In subsection (4), for “the limit of his jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(3) In subsection (5), for “the limit of the officer causing the charge to be laid” substitute “the officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(4) In subsection (6), for “the limit of the officer causing the charge to be laid” substitute “the officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(5) In subsection (7), for “the limit of the committal authority’s jurisdiction” substitute “the committal authority’s penalty limitation level”.
(6) In subsection (8), for “the limit of the committal authority’s jurisdiction” substitute “the committal authority’s penalty limitation level”.
This amends Section 134, which concerns the power of a commanding officer (CO) to award punishments summarily.
The legislation standardizes and updates the terminology for the maximum severity of punishment a CO can impose, replacing phrases like "the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction" with the defined term "the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level" throughout the section.
- Section 136 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (power of commanding officer to award punishment in certain cases) is amended as follows.
(1) In subsection (1), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(2) In subsection (2), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(3) In subsection (3), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
Section 136 grants a commanding officer the power to award punishments in specific circumstances, often related to summary jurisdiction.
Similar to the previous change, this section updates the language referring to the maximum penalty a CO can apply, substituting it with "the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level."
Related
The Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Act 2026 (Meaning of “Digital Sequence Information”) Regulations 2026
The Regulations formally defined 'digital sequence information' in relation to marine genetic resources for the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Act 2026.
Read MoreThe Air Navigation (Restriction of Flying) (Edinburgh) Regulations 2026
The regulations imposed temporary flight restrictions over Edinburgh airspace for specific periods between June 27th and July 3rd, 2026, to ensure public safety during the State Opening of the Scottish Parliament and Royal Week.
Read MoreThe Air Navigation (Restriction of Flying) (Wembley Stadium, London) Regulations 2026
The Regulations imposed temporary flight restrictions on unmanned aircraft around Wembley Stadium for a specified period on May 16th, 2026, to ensure public safety during the FA Cup Final.
Read MoreThe Building Safety (Responsible Actors Scheme and Prohibitions) (Amendment) Regulations 2026
The Regulations amended the 2023 rules governing the Responsible Actors Scheme by correcting language, omitting a prohibition notice, and modifying exceptions related to building control prohibitions for various building works and property transfers.
Read More