The Local Government Pension Scheme (Elected Member Pensions) (Consequential Amendment) Regulations 2026
The Armed Forces Act 2021 primarily amends and updates the law governing the discipline, administration, and justice system of the UK Armed Forces, focusing on procedural efficiency, clarification of powers relating to service offences, modifications to administrative processes like discharge, and refining sentencing and jurisdiction within the service courts.
Arguments For
The Act modernizes and clarifies the service justice system, ensuring it remains robust, fair, and effective in holding service personnel accountable.
Introducing new summary jurisdiction powers allows for quicker, more proportionate responses to minor disciplinary matters, reducing administrative burden.
Provisions regarding the discharge and termination of service provide greater clarity and consistency in administrative processes affecting service personnel.
Extending the ability to defer court martial sentencing improves flexibility in dealing with complex cases involving service personnel, especially where civilian proceedings are also involved.
Clarifying certain aspects of existing service law keeps the disciplinary code aligned with contemporary values and legal standards.
Arguments Against
Critics may argue that expanding summary jurisdiction risks undermining judicial independence or disproportionately punishing minor infractions at an early stage without full due process.
Detailed administrative changes to discharge procedures, while aimed at consistency, might inadvertently remove necessary discretionary powers held by commanding officers in unique circumstances.
Any amendment to service law requires significant training and familiarization across the chain of command, potentially leading to temporary inconsistencies in application during the transition period.
Concerns might arise about the potential overlap or conflict between service law procedures and civilian justice outcomes, particularly following deferred sentencing.
PART 1 SERVICE JUSTICE SYSTEM Jurisdiction 1. (1) Section 104 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (jurisdiction of Courts Martial) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (2), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(3) In subsection (3), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(4) In subsection (4), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(5) In subsection (5), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
(6) In subsection (6), for “a person subject to service law” substitute “a person to whom service law applies”.
This part amends Section 104 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 concerning which individuals fall under the jurisdiction of Courts Martial.
The principal change involves replacing the phrase "a person subject to service law" with the more general phrasing "a person to whom service law applies" wherever it appears in that section, ensuring consistent legal terminology regarding who can be tried by a Court Martial.
(1) Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (power to charge person with offence under service law or civilian law) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (2), for “Section 115 of the Armed Forces Act 2006” substitute “This section”.
(3) Insert after subsection (3)—
“(3A) If the Director of Service Prosecutions decides to charge the person under service law with an offence under service law, the Director must give a notice in writing to the person stating that the Director has decided to charge the person under service law with an offence under service law.”
(4) In subsection (4), for “subsection (3)” substitute “subsection (3A) and (3)”.
This modifies Section 115 of the 2006 Act, which deals with the power to prosecute an individual under either service law or civilian law for an offense committed.
A significant addition requires the Director of Service Prosecutions (DSP) to issue a written notice to the person if they choose to initiate proceedings under service law, ensuring the accused is formally informed of the legal pathway selected.
(1) Section 124 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (referral of charge to Court Martial) is amended as follows.
(2) In subsection (1), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(3) In subsection (2), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(4) In subsection (3), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(5) In subsection (4), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(6) In subsection (5), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
(7) In subsection (6), for “a person to whom service law applies” substitute “a person subject to service law”.
Section 124 outlines the procedure for referring a charge to a Court Martial.
This amendment reverses terminology used in the previous sections: it changes references from "a person to whom service law applies" back to "a person subject to service law" within various subsections of Section 124.
- Section 134 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (Power of commanding officer to award punishment) is amended as follows.
(1) In subsection (1), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(2) In subsection (4), for “the limit of his jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(3) In subsection (5), for “the limit of the officer causing the charge to be laid” substitute “the officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(4) In subsection (6), for “the limit of the officer causing the charge to be laid” substitute “the officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(5) In subsection (7), for “the limit of the committal authority’s jurisdiction” substitute “the committal authority’s penalty limitation level”.
(6) In subsection (8), for “the limit of the committal authority’s jurisdiction” substitute “the committal authority’s penalty limitation level”.
This amends Section 134, which concerns the power of a commanding officer (CO) to award punishments summarily.
The legislation standardizes and updates the terminology for the maximum severity of punishment a CO can impose, replacing phrases like "the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction" with the defined term "the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level" throughout the section.
- Section 136 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (power of commanding officer to award punishment in certain cases) is amended as follows.
(1) In subsection (1), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(2) In subsection (2), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
(3) In subsection (3), for “the limit of the commanding officer’s jurisdiction” substitute “the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level”.
Section 136 grants a commanding officer the power to award punishments in specific circumstances, often related to summary jurisdiction.
Similar to the previous change, this section updates the language referring to the maximum penalty a CO can apply, substituting it with "the commanding officer’s penalty limitation level."
Related
The Anti-avoidance Information Notices (Resolution of Disputes as to Privilege) Regulations 2026
The regulations defined the procedure for resolving disputes about whether information requested under an anti-avoidance notice in the Finance Act 2026 is privileged, including referral to the tribunal.
Read MoreThe Insolvency (England and Wales) (Amendment) Rules 2026
Implemented amendments to the Service Justice System, established procedures for service complaints, and updated provisions concerning service law for the UK Armed Forces.
Read MoreCorrection Slip
A formal correction was issued in May 2026 for the 2026 Regulations concerning fees for registration of births, deaths, marriages, and civil partnerships in England and Wales, adding a regulation note and correcting a row reference in the Schedule.
Read MoreThe A46 Coventry Junctions (Walsgrave) Development Consent (Correction) Order 2026
The legal instrument corrected specified technical errors and omissions within the associated A46 Coventry Junctions (Walsgrave) Development Consent Order 2026 following a formal request.
Read More