The Environmental Delivery Plans (Appropriate Prioritisation) Regulations 2026

Published: Thu 18th Jun 26 Came into force: Thu 9th Jul 26

Mandated a hierarchy for Natural England to prioritize avoiding environmental damage over mitigation or compensation in development plans as of July 2026.


These Regulations establish a hierarchy of conservation measures that Natural England must follow when drafting or amending Environmental Delivery Plans (EDPs) under the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025.

The agency is directed to prioritize avoidance of environmental damage over mitigation, and mitigation over compensation, provided such prioritisation is deemed appropriate and delivers value for money.

These rules apply specifically to Natural England's administrative processes in England and require the agency to explicitly categorize all proposed conservation measures within their plans.

Arguments For

  • The document establishes a hierarchy of conservation actions, prioritizing the prevention of environmental damage (avoidance) over attempts to reduce damage (mitigation) or offset it elsewhere (compensation).

  • Proponents may argue this hierarchy ensures that the most effective methods of protecting environmental features are considered before less certain methods like compensation.

  • The regulations require Natural England to consider value for money, which the document suggests ensures that the prioritisation remains economically appropriate while pursuing environmental goals.

  • The document states that defining these measures clearly in draft plans provides transparency regarding how development impacts are being addressed.

Arguments Against

  • Legal scholars might question the ambiguity of the phrase "where they consider it is appropriate to do so," which grants Natural England broad discretion to deviate from the hierarchy.

  • Environmental organizations could argue that the requirement to have regard for "value for money" might lead to the selection of cheaper compensation schemes over more effective but costly avoidance measures.

  • Affected developers or local authorities may find the lack of a full impact assessment problematic, as the document asserts no significant impact is foreseen without providing detailed economic data.

Citation, commencement, extent and application

  1. -(1) These Regulations may be cited as the Environmental Delivery Plans (Appropriate Prioritisation) Regulations 2026.
  • (2) These Regulations come into force on 9th July 2026.
  • (3) These Regulations extend to England and Wales.
  • (4) These Regulations apply in relation to England only.

Interpretation

  1. In these Regulations-

'the Act' means the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025,

'avoidance measures' are conservation measures( 2 ) which are intended to avoid the negative effect of the EDP development on the conservation status of an identified environmental feature( 3 ),

'compensation measures' are conservation measures which are intended to compensate for the negative effect of the EDP development on the conservation status of an identified environmental feature,

( 1 ) 2025 c. 34.

( 2 ) 'Conservation measures' is defined in section 61(3) of the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 (c. 34).

( 3 ) 'Environmental feature' has the meaning given in section 61 of the Planning and Infrastructure Act 2025 (c. 34).

'EDP development' means the maximum amount of development to which the EDP may apply, as specified in accordance with section 60(5) of the Act,

'mitigation measures' are conservation measures which are intended to mitigate the negative effect of the EDP development on the conservation status of an identified environmental feature, and

'negative effect of the EDP development' has the same meaning as section 65(5) of the Act.

Appropriate prioritisation

  1. -(1) When preparing a draft EDP Natural England must prioritise-
  • (a) avoidance measures over mitigation measures and compensation measures, and
  • (b) mitigation measures over compensation measures,

where they consider it is appropriate to do so.

(2) When considering making a request to the Secretary of State to amend an EDP, Natural England must prioritise-

  • (a) avoidance measures over mitigation measures and compensation measures, and
  • (b) mitigation measures over compensation measures,

where they consider it is appropriate to do so.

(3) When considering whether it is appropriate to prioritise conservation measures Natural England should have regard to the extent to which they deliver value for money.

(4) Natural England must set out in a draft EDP or an EDP as proposed to be amended which conservation measures proposed will, in whole or in part, be-

  • (a) avoidance measures,
  • (b) mitigation measures, or
  • (c) compensation measures.

(5) Nothing in this regulation affects the order in which Natural England implements the conservation measures set out in an EDP after it has been made or amended by the Secretary of State.

Related

The Registration of Births and Deaths (England and Wales) (Specified Requirements) Regulations 2026

Thu 5th Nov 26

Mandated truth declarations and identity verification for persons registering births and deaths in England and Wales.

Read More

The Strategic Planning Authorities (Spatial Development Strategy) Regulations 2026

Thu 5th Nov 26

Established procedural requirements for English authorities to create, consult upon, and monitor regional spatial development strategies.

Read More

The Strategic Planning (Consequential and Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2026

Thu 5th Nov 26

Updated regional planning frameworks by revoking the Yorkshire and Humber strategy and standardizing spatial development powers across major English combined authorities.

Read More

The Strategic Planning (Costs of Public Examinations) (Standard Daily Amount) (England) Regulations 2026

Thu 5th Nov 26

Established a £993 standard daily fee for inspectors conducting strategic planning public examinations in England effective 26 November 2026.

Read More