This Order may be cited as the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2025 and comes into force on 19th December 2025.
The Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2025
The Secretary of State has issued The Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2025, which makes non-material changes to the original 2021 Development Consent Order for the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm.
This Order, effective December 19th, 2025, officially incorporates a definition for Defra, updates the definition of the undertaker, corrects several precise geographical coordinates defining the authorized development, and significantly amends compensation provisions related to the Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation (HHW SAC) by introducing the Marine Recovery Fund as a potential alternative to direct marine debris removal.
Arguments For
The amendment formally incorporates Defra into the legal framework governing the project, clarifying responsibilities for environmental mitigation and compensation discussions.
Updating the definition of 'undertaker' ensures a clear legal entity is responsible for the project moving forward.
Adjustments to specific geographical coordinates (Longitude and Latitude) maintain technical accuracy required for a precisely defined offshore development consent order.
Revising compensation mechanisms, particularly regarding the Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation (HHW SAC), allows for adaptive management through the Marine Recovery Fund, providing flexibility if specific debris removal targets are not met.
Arguments Against
Introducing substitutions for compensation measures, such as allowing payment into the Marine Recovery Fund instead of achieving specific debris removal targets, may be viewed as diluting the original environmental commitments made to the HHW SAC.
The process of amending a Development Consent Order (DCO) through non-material changes, even if deemed appropriate by the Secretary of State, can introduce complexity for stakeholders tracking regulatory compliance.
Changing the undertaker definition necessitates verifying that the replacement entity maintains the capacity and commitment to execute the entire authorized development as consented.
Adding new defined terms (BIMP, BSG, Marine Recovery Fund) in Schedule 19 adds layers of complexity to the interpretation of environmental mitigation requirements.
Accordingly, the Secretary of State, in exercise of the powers in paragraph 2(1) and (9) of Schedule 6 to the Planning Act 2008, makes the following Order.
The preamble explains that an application was submitted to the Secretary of State requesting non-material changes to the existing Development Consent Order (DCO) for the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm.
This process followed specific regulations under the Planning Act 2008.
After reviewing the application and required consultation responses, the Secretary of State determined the proposed changes are not materially different from what was requested and exercised statutory powers to issue this amending Order.
Citation and commencement
1.
Article 1 specifies the official short title of this legislative instrument as the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2025.
It also sets the date when this amending Order legally takes effect, which is December 19th, 2025.
Amendment to the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Order 2021
2.
The Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Order 2021 is amended in accordance with this Order.
Article 2 establishes that the provisions contained within this new Order will modify or replace certain parts of the primary legal document, the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Order 2021.
Amendments to Article 2 (Interpretation)
3.
In Article 2 (Interpretation), after the definition of “Defence Infrastructure Organisation Safeguarding” insert the following definition ““Defra” means the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and any successor body to its functions;”
.
4.
In Article 2 (Interpretation), substitute the definition of “undertaker”
with “means, subject to article 6 (Benefit of the Order), Norfolk Boreas Limited (Company No. 03722058)”.
Articles 3 and 4 introduce changes within the definitions section (Article 2) of the original DCO. Article 3 formally defines 'Defra' as the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and any future entity taking over its role.
Article 4 revises who is legally identified as the 'undertaker,' explicitly naming Norfolk Boreas Limited (Company No. 03722058), subject to Article 6 of the Order.
Amendments to Part 1 (Authorised Development) of Schedule 1 (Authorised Project)
5.
Paragraph 2 of Part 1 (Authorised Development) of Schedule 1 (Authorised Project) is amended as follows—
(a)
Substitute Longitude (DMS) at point 29 with “002° 59’ 17.972” E”;
(b)
Substitute Longitude (DMS) at point 67 with “002° 59’ 02.0169” E”;
(c)
Substitute Latitude (DMS) at point 164 with “52° 50’ 36.142” N”; and
(d)
Substitute Longitude (DMS) at point 164 with “002° 35’ 08.679” E”.
Article 5 modifies the technical details of the authorized offshore development by changing specific geographical coordinates listed in Schedule 1, Part 1.
It substitutes the Degree, Minute, Second (DMS) values for longitude at points 29 and 67, and both latitude and longitude at point 164.
These changes ensure the defined physical boundaries of the wind farm remain accurate.
Amendments to Part 3 (Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation: Delivery of measures to compensate for cable installation and protection) of Schedule 19 (Compensation to protect the coherence of the national site network)
(1)
Part 3 (Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation: Delivery of measures to compensate for cable installation and protection) of Schedule 19 (Compensation to protect the coherence of the national site network), is amended as follows—
(2)
“23.
In this Part—
“BIMP” means the benthic implementation and monitoring plan for the delivery of measures to compensate for the cable installation and protection in the HHW SAC as a result of the authorised development;
“BSG” means the benthic steering group who will shape and inform the scope and delivery of the BIMP;
“completion report” means the report submitted to the Secretary of State pursuant to paragraph 33;
“HHW SAC” means Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation;
“HHW SAC compensation plan” means the document certified as the In Principle Habitats Regulations Derogation, Provision of Evidence, Appendix 3 Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton SAC In Principle Compensation by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this Order under article 37 (Certification of plans etc);
“Marine Recovery Fund” means the fund to be established and operated pursuant to section 292 of the Energy Act 2023 for the implementation of strategic compensation or any equivalent fund established by a Government body for that purpose; and
“Marine Recovery Fund Payment” means a contribution to the Marine Recovery Fund to compensate for impacts on protected features of the HHW SAC as a result of the authorised development, the sum of which will be agreed with Defra or any other organisation responsible for the operation of the Marine Recovery Fund.”.
(3)
In paragraph 30, omit “In particular, no cable installation works in the HHW SAC may be commenced unless at least 8.3 hectares of marine debris has been removed in accordance with the programme referred to in paragraph 29(d).”.
(4)
“32.
Unless otherwise agreed with the Secretary of State, results from the monitoring scheme must be submitted at least annually to the Secretary of State, the MMO and the relevant statutory nature conservation body. This must include details of any finding that the measures have been ineffective in securing an improvement in the condition of the HHW SAC and, in such case, proposals to address this. Any proposals to address effectiveness must thereafter be implemented by the undertaker as approved in writing by the Secretary of State in consultation with the MMO and the relevant statutory nature conservation body.”.
(5)
“33.
Subject to paragraph 35 and paragraph 38(b), a report which demonstrates completion of the activities required by the BIMP must be submitted to the Secretary of State within 12 months of completion of such activities.”.
(6)
“35.
In the event that the required area of marine debris is not removed (whether wholly or in part) the undertaker may apply to the Secretary of State to make a Marine Recovery Fund Payment as an adaptive management measure in substitution for the area of marine debris removal which has not been achieved.
36.
The application under paragraph 35 will set out—
(a)
the proportion of the overall area of marine debris removal required where the impact on the HHW SAC is shared with the Norfolk Vanguard offshore wind farm by virtue of the shared cable corridor; and
(b)
the amount of material removed under the BIMP as reported in the most recent document submitted pursuant to paragraph 32 (subject to any reductions already taken into account for any contribution under the Norfolk Vanguard Offshore Wind Farm).
37.
Following receipt of any application pursuant to paragraph 35, the Secretary of State must be satisfied—
(a)
that the application to use the Marine Recovery Fund as an adaptive management measure is acceptable in principle including (if relevant) the exact proportion of the original compensation for which a Marine Recovery Fund Payment can be accepted in substitution; and
(b)
that Defra or any other organisation responsible for the operation of the Marine Recovery Fund has confirmed that the Marine Recovery Fund can be used, such confirmation to include monetary quantification of the sums due in lieu of the compensation measures.
38.
If the Secretary of State is satisfied that the criteria set out in paragraph 37 have been met, he may notify the undertaker that the application made under paragraph 35 is approved, following which there must be no cable installation works within the HHW SAC unless and until—
(a)
an implementation and monitoring plan has been submitted to and approved by the Secretary of State; and
(b)
the undertaker has been discharged from any further obligations under this Part to deliver compensation measures in accordance with paragraph 39.
39.
The undertaker will be discharged from any further obligations under this Part to deliver compensation measures either—
(a)
following approval of the completion report by the Secretary of State, in consultation with the MMO and the statutory nature conservation body;
(b)
upon paying the full amount of the agreed Marine Recovery Fund Payment provided that the Secretary of State has confirmed in writing that such payment fulfils the requirement for compensation measures; or
(c)
upon entering into a contract with Defra or any other organisation responsible for the operation of the Marine Recovery Fund to make the agreed Marine Recovery Fund Payment in instalments and having made the first payment in a series of instalments under that contract provided that the Secretary of State has confirmed in writing that such payment fulfils the requirement for compensation measures.
40.
Any discharge pursuant to paragraph 39(c) from further obligations under this Part to deliver compensation measures does not obviate the undertaker from its obligation to continue to comply with any payment schedule or any other conditions that form part of the contract entered into between the undertaker and Defra or any other organisation responsible for the operation of the Marine Recovery Fund.”.
Article 6 introduces substantial amendments to Schedule 19, Part 3, which deals with measures to protect the Haisborough, Hammond and Winterton Special Area of Conservation (HHW SAC) from cable installation impacts.
Subsections (1) and (2) replace Paragraph 23 with new definitions relevant to compensation, introducing terms like BIMP, BSG, Marine Recovery Fund, and Marine Recovery Fund Payment, clarifying that payments compensate for impacts agreed upon with Defra.
Subsection (3) removes a prerequisite that required the removal of 8.3 hectares of marine debris before cable works could start in the HHW SAC. Subsections (4) and (5) update the requirements for submitting monitoring results and completion reports.
Subsection (6) inserts new paragraphs 35 through 40, creating an 'adaptive management' pathway allowing the undertaker to apply for permission to make a Marine Recovery Fund Payment instead of completing the required physical debris removal.
This application requires confirmation from the Secretary of State and Defra regarding the scope and value of the substitution payment.
Once approved, cable works can proceed if an implementation plan is approved and the undertaker is discharged from further compensation obligations, either by approval of the completion report, a lump-sum payment, or entering into an installment contract with the relevant fund administrator.
Signed by authority of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero
This concluding section confirms the document was signed on December 18th, 2025, under the authority of the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero.
The signatory is identified as John Wheadon, Head of Energy Infrastructure Planning Delivery within that Department.
This Order amends The Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Order 2021, a development consent order under the Planning Act 2008, following an application made in accordance with the Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011 for a non-material change under paragraph 2 of Schedule 6 to the Planning Act 2008.
The Explanatory Note clarifies that the Order legally amends the Norfolk Boreas Offshore Wind Farm Order 2021, which is a Development Consent Order made under the Planning Act 2008.
The amendments arise from a formal, non-material change application submitted under the relevant 2011 Regulations.